Newsflash

Home arrow Reviews arrow TSP Curl P1-R 0.5mm
Review: TSP Curl P1-R 0.5mm PDF Print E-mail
Written by haggisv   
Thursday, 18 October 2007
TSP Curl P1-R in 0.5mm, by haggisv

Source: Forum Thread:
http://forum.oneofakindtrading.com.au/viewtopic.php?t=370

LawOCG kindly let me try this rubber (0.5mm), so I'll put some comments here, and compare it to 955 0.6mm.

Well this is another remarkable rubber from TSP, I've been impressed with ALL the ones I've tried! The word out there is that this is one of the hardest rubbers to control but also among the most dangerous. Well as already mentioned by LawOCG, the sponge makes quite a difference. I suspect that the word ouit there refers to the thicker sponge version, because I found the control on the 0.5mm very good!

On my Energy wood blade, I actually found this rubber relatatively slow with very good control. It was a fair bit slower than the 955, even compared to OX!

It's most remarkable property that I found was blocking against fast loops... I got so many more on, and the sink was very good! It does require a positive and forward stroke, and simply putting the bat there made it really grip, and fly over the end of the table... But with a slow forward and upwards stroke, the ball landed on the table even against fast loops, with a real nice sink effect... they did not come back....

Attacking against backspin was not quite a easy as with the 955, but still pretty good. Since the pimples seems more grippy the further the dig the ball in, you can't afford to let it dig in too much or you'll give up spin reversal.

In general it was good in the short game, producing more LP effect than the 955... some good wobble balls too. I wasn't to sure why the ball was doing what it was doiing on a few occasions...

Chopping against backspin can be done effectively, but you need to compensate for the incoming spin...

Away from the table it perform very well too, good ability to manipulate spin. The control in general was almost as good as the 955. I found it easier to keep the ball shorter, mainly bacause it felt slower... Against loops I still preferred the 955, but I need more time to find out why...

I think I'll need a few more sessions to draw conclusions on whether it's better for my game, but it's the best I've found so far since the 955.
Last Updated ( Friday, 19 October 2007 )
 
© 2017 Pips
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.